Comment Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://anthologiagraeca.org/api/comments/1130/?format=api",
    "passages": [
        "https://anthologiagraeca.org/api/passages/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg7000.tlg001.ag:9.359/?format=api"
    ],
    "descriptions": [
        {
            "content": "# Paternité \r\n\r\nLa paternité de cette épigramme est débattue. \r\n\r\nLes Belles Lettres, t. VIII, p. 183 : \"L'attribution de cette pièce est incertaine. Schott la refuse avec raison à Posidippe l'épigrammatiste. Notons que le *palatinus* et Planude proposent l'un et l'autre une double attribution et que la mention οἱ δὲ Κράτητος τοῦ Κυνικοῦ est très semblable à οἱ δὲ Πλάτωνος τοῦ Κωμικοῦ : deux interprétation d'une même lecture difficile ? Stadtmüller pensait que le titre original était : Ποσειδίππου τοῦ Κωμικοῦ.\"\r\n\r\nGow et Page, Hellenistic Epigrams, t. II, p. 502 : \"Its authorship is highly obscure ; this Posidippus, Plato Comicus, Crates, Heraclitus (given in one *florilegium*), all seem unlikely. Stadtmüller thought that the original lemma may have been Ποσειδίππου τοῦ κωμικοῦ, which would account for that in P, but his hypothesis is not advanced by his citationof pessimistic fragments of Posidippus (18-20, 22, 30), for a dramatist does not necessarily share the sentiments of his characters. It should be added that the epigram is not plainly even Hellenistic. Its context at A.P. 9.359 is 344-56 Leonidas of Alexandria, 357-8 anon., 360 Metrodorus, 361 Leon : Leon is a Byzantine, Metrodorus of uncertain date. This epigram and Metrodorus's counterblast hang together, but there is nothing in the contexte to attract them to this particular place or any reason to assume that 359 comes from Meleager.\"",
            "language": "fra"
        }
    ],
    "unique_id": 1214,
    "created_at": "2022-08-04T20:13:38.305600Z",
    "updated_at": "2022-08-04T20:13:38.305600Z",
    "comment_type": "user_note",
    "images": []
}